Imagine a person in Pennsylvania who is prohibited from owning a gun due to a past conviction from years ago. One night, an intruder breaks into their home and threatens their family. The person’s partner legally owns a gun stored in the home. In a desperate moment to save lives, the prohibited person grabs the gun to stop the threat.
Should that person face criminal charges for acting to save their family?
While most people agree that protecting loved ones is right, Pennsylvania gun laws are strict. Understanding how prosecutors, judges, and juries review emergency gun possession is vital for anyone facing this tough legal issue.
Table of Contents
Toggle
Under Pennsylvania law (18 Pa.C.S. § 6105), certain individuals cannot legally own, hold, or use a gun. This restriction applies to people with past criminal records, court protection orders, or legal disqualifications.
A common mistake is thinking a prohibited person is safe if the gun belongs to someone else. Under Section 6105, the law focuses on physical possession and control, not who bought the weapon.
Key facts about gun ownership and control include:
Pennsylvania law recognizes that real emergencies happen. Under 18 Pa.C.S. § 503, the law allows a defense called Justification (also called the necessity defense).
A justification defense argues that breaking a rule was legally allowed because it stopped a greater, immediate harm.
To use a justification defense for holding a gun as a prohibited person, a defense lawyer must show key facts:
Immediate Danger: The threat to life must be happening right then. A future or general threat does not justify picking up a gun.
No Safe Alternative: The person had no safe way to escape or get help, like calling 911 or locking a door, before grabbing the gun.
Limited Possession: The prohibited person held the gun only during the exact life-threatening threat. Once safety was restored, the gun was put down right away.
In addition to justifying holding the gun, any use of force must follow Pennsylvania self-defense rules under 18 Pa.C.S. § 505.
Using a gun during a home break-in must meet key legal rules:
There is a big difference between someone illegally carrying a gun on the street and someone grabbing a household gun to defend their family during a break-in.
An experienced Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney works to show these facts early in the case:
You can still be charged with unlawful gun possession under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6105. However, you may use a legal justification defense under 18 Pa.C.S. § 503 if you grabbed the gun to stop immediate harm to life.
No. Section 6105 bans physical possession and control regardless of who bought or registered the gun.
Possession must end the second the immediate threat stops. Holding or keeping the gun after safety is secure destroys a justification defense.
Yes. Federal law under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) also bans gun possession by certain individuals. Federal authorities review emergency claims separately from state prosecutors.
Key evidence includes 911 audio recordings, home security video, evidence of forced entry, police reports, and witness statements confirming the immediate threat.
Educational Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal advice. Facing gun charges under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6105 involves serious legal penalties. Always talk with a qualified Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney about your specific case.
Montgomery 12/2016
Automated page speed optimizations for fast site performance